Sunday, August 14, 2022

Radical Gender Theory and Twitter Bans

This is my first post here in over 10 years. This post is not about Elliot Page, the new name chosen by the actress formerly named Ellen Page. I neither care if Ms. Page ever sees nor presume she ever will see this post. This is about Twitter and their stupid site rules.

Twitter locked my account because I tweeted:

Eliot Page is a woman.

In an eyesight-induced mistake, I thought her name had only one L. My bad. But, of course, that wasn't the problem.

In an explanatory email, Twitter said, 

You may not promote violence against, threaten, or harass other people on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, or serious disease.

Twitter is notoriously oblique about their "safety" policies, which makes them seem arbitrary and unevenly applied. 

For instance, accounts on Twitter giddily endorsed the violence against Salmon Rushdie, (allegedly, as of this writing) stabbed by a religious zealot onstage after the Iranian Ayatollah put a bounty on Rushdie's head. Those tweets, as of this writing, are still active.

Clearly some minion, or a minion's bot, at Twitter thought my five words were enough to promote violence against someone, threaten them, or harass them, while literally calling for someone to be killed was not.

Saying "Elliot Page is a woman" does not promote violence against Elliot Page or anyone else. 

The argument may be that since people who want to be the sex they aren't commit suicide at a higher rate than normal people, addressing them as their biological sex risks them killing themselves and is therefor promoting violence against them.

But no one has shown that to be the case.  While social acceptance and especially familial acceptance are factors in the suicide rate among people confused about their sex, there's a difference between social acceptance of a person and affirmatively agreeing with a person's false beliefs. 

Furthermore, if it is the case that people who believe themselves to be a sex they are not commit suicide at a higher rate, we should make every effort to minimize the number of people who think that. Gender dysphoria is the problem, not the solution.

If people are so fragile that the mere use of the wrong pronoun or the mere suggestion by some stranger online that their biology overrules their presentation causes them to spiral into suicide, they are in fact not well mentally. 

We should strive to accept one another socially. We don't have to affirmatively agree with each other's false beliefs to do that.

We accept the religious and political views of people without adopting those beliefs ourselves. We can rejoice that other people like strawberry ice cream or broccoli, both of which are horrid non-foods, even if we ourselves do not like them. We can be happy that there are sports or theater events or television shows that other people like. We do not have to like those things ourselves to accept them, tolerate them, or to readily admit they exist.

We can accept people who are attracted only, or almost only, to a particular sex that we are not, or any level in between.

We can accept that people have schizophrenia without telling them to believe the voices in their heads. We can accept depression and manic depression as problems with real physical, emotional, and neurological causes without cruelly endorsing the depressed person's feelings of worthlessness.

Some men like to wear women's clothing and makeup; OK. That doesn't make them women.

It is not always kind to affirm a person's false belief.

Saying "Elliot Page is a woman" is not threatening Elliot or anyone else. 

Saying "Eliot Page is a woman" is not harassing anyone

I use Elliot's new name because people should be able to name themselves as they wish. People change their names all the time, such as when getting married, divorced, adopted, or simply deciding they don't like their first names and want to use their middle or nicknames.The former Miss Ellen Page could even have said, "It's spelled e-l-l-e-n but pronounce 'Elliot,' and I'd have used that pronunciation.  

Using someone's former name is not an attack on them. It's a personal slight that could rise to the level of rudeness if done to them in person, but faces a steep slope to be called rude in writing, even in a public forum.

Since people can change their names arbitrarily, I'll happily use that name when someone changes it, whether I agree with their reasons for the change or not. 

But what people cannot do is change sexes. We're born either male or female, and remain that way until our bodies return to dust. I don't care if people want to pretend they're something they're not, but I don't have to pretend along with them. A name is one thing; a description is another.

Some people conform to the appearance of the opposite sex so well that no one knows their true identity. That's fine, who cares? Pretend all day if you want.

But to force me to pretend is to force me to lie, and I decline.

I deleted the tweet, following the stupid site rules. 

Elliot Page is still a woman.

 


Sphere: Related Content

Monday, February 13, 2012

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Illinois Leads Nation in Jobs ... Lost.

From the Illinois Policy Institute comes this stunning statistic: while most of the rest of the nation saw its unemployment rate fall, Illinois saw its rate go up, with by far the nation's worst performance. To make matters worse, not only did Illinois taxpayers see their rates go up, but the budget deficit used to justify it is still there.
The unemployment increase follows the election of Democrat Governor Pat Quinn and a draconian 66% tax hike pushed by Quinn's public employee union backers.

Almost a year after Illinois’ record income tax increase, the state’s unemployment woes contrast starkly with the slow but positive national economic recovery. Unemployment rates in 46 states dropped since January 2011, and some dramatically. Illinois’ unemployment rate, on the other hand, was 9.8 percent in December, up from 9 percent in January 2011. Simply put, in 2011 Illinois placed more people on the unemployment rolls than any other state in the country.

While surrounding states like Wisconsin, Indiana, and Missouri create pro-employment climates, Illinois is stuck in the same pattern of big government cronyism and tax increases to fund lavish state employee pensions.


Sphere: Related Content

Monday, December 19, 2011

Another Reason Lugar Must Go #INSen

Dick Lugar (R-IN) has been a Senator for so long, he's lost touch with the way things work outside the Senate cloakroom.



Lugar called for the House to pass the Senate's bill that extends the current payroll tax rate by two months because it was "best for the country".



Yet as The Right Sphere reports, that will cause huge problems for the businesses who have to implement it.



A little common sense would show why. Businesses that calculate payroll taxes do so with accounting payroll software. It takes time for these non-trivial changes to software and business practices to be implemented. A payroll tax switchover is already cooked in to most accounting packages, so that the planned payroll tax changes will happen automatically when current law would have them change (Jauary 1). Because payroll software needs accuracy, any significant alteration will take weeks to plan and execute, passing the window for the extension.



As Rep Renee Ellmers (R,NC02) said in her press release:

Last week we passed a bill here in the House that extends the payroll tax cut for a full year. But instead of passing the House bill, or another bill which extended the payroll credit for a year, the Democrats in the Senate opted for a meager two month extension…that's the definition of uncertainty!





The Senate refuses to do the job they were elected to do and is being irresponsible. They have not even passed a budget in over 950 days and now are kicking the can down the road again by only extending the payroll tax for a mere two months. A two month payroll tax extension is a disgrace. Americans have enough uncertainty with their jobs and homes. Senator Reid is kicking them while they're down with this proposal.




Senator Lugar has ceased to understand the needs of Indiana, and should yield the floor to a new generation.

Amplify’d from thehill.com

GOP's Lugar: House should pass tax bill for the good of the country





By Daniel Strauss

-

12/19/11 01:22 PM ET





Sen. Dick Lugar (R-Ind.) on Monday said House Republicans need to pass the Senate's two-month extension of the payroll tax cut for the good of the country.  

"I'm hopeful there are a majority of Republicans and Democrats today who will proceed, because it seems to me this is best for the country, as well as for all the individuals who are affected," Lugar said Monday on MSNBC.  

Read more at thehill.com
 


Sphere: Related Content

Friday, December 16, 2011

HHS ObamaCare Targets Insurance Companies Again

The Department of Health and Human Services is sprinting like mad to get ObamaCare implemented ahead of the 2013 inauguration of President Obama's successor, trying to cement as much of the law as possible state and federal bureaucracy. Today they promulgate more in their ever-expanding set of regulations about what is and is not insurance. The result will limit consumer choice and force more and more onto Medicaid.



HHS says state governments should pick one of the health plans available in their state as a "benchmark", but by that they mean "baseline": plans offered after the determination is made could only be more generous than the selected plan.



This approach, like the rest of ObamaCare, can only serve to narrow the number of choices consumers have, forcing more and more insurance companies out of the marketplace altogether.



The end result will be more and more people who are forced to choose Medicaid as their health insurance, while many others are unable to afford insurance altogether.

Amplify’d from www.hhs.gov

HHS to give states more flexibility to implement health reform

Under the Department’s intended approach announced today, states would have the flexibility to select an existing health plan to set the “benchmark” for the items and services included in the essential health benefits package.  States would choose one of the following health insurance plans as a benchmark:

  • One of the three largest small group plans in the state;
  • One of the three largest state employee health plans; 
  • One of the three largest federal employee health plan options;
  • The largest HMO plan offered in the state’s commercial market.  

The benefits and services included in the health insurance plan selected by the state would be the essential health benefits package.  Plans could modify coverage within a benefit category so long as they do not reduce the value of coverage.  Consistent with the law, states must ensure the essential health benefits package covers items and services in at least ten categories of care, including preventive care, emergency services, maternity care, hospital and physician services, and prescription drugs.  If a state selects a plan that does not cover all ten categories of care, the state will have the option to examine other benchmark insurance plans, including the Federal Employee Health Benefits Plan, to determine the type of benefits that will be included in the essential health benefits package.   

Read more at www.hhs.gov
 


Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

NTSB Power Grab

In a move well outside its charter, the National Transportatation Safety Board on December 13 called for the 50 states to ban the use of texting and other electronic communications in moving vehicles.



http://www.ntsb.gov/news/2011/111213.html



NTSB couches its outrageous power grab in terms few would dispute, that "No call, no text, no update, is worth a human life."



But the bargain the texter faces is not to trade his life for a single call, text, or update, but rather an increased risk that he will be insufficiently attentive to the driving task while engaged with the portable device.



According to the NTSB's press release itself, there are more cell phones in use in the U.S. than there are people. So (taking the NTSB's causality statistics arguendo) if there are 3,100 deaths per year due to cell phone use while driving, then less than 1 in 100,000 cell phones "causes" a traffic death every year.



More precisely, suppose, given the statistics here:



http://www.edgarsnyder.com/car-accident/cell-phone/statistics.html



that roughly 20% of drivers are regular texters. That would mean that of the 930 billion vehicle miles driven by Americans every year,



(http://www.calculatedriskblog.com)



about 180 billion miles are driven by regular texters.



Over the course of 180 billion miles, 3,100 deaths yield one death for every 58 million miles.



Yes, talking on the phone is risky, as is texting, updating Facebook, or changing radio stations.



But every time we allow the government to restrict our ability to take risks, we take one more incremental step toward a soft, pillowy totalitarian world in which we exist endlessly and live not at all.

Amplify’d from techliberation.com

NTSB and Electronic Devices: Regulation by Anecdote

But the National Transportation Safety Board’s recommendation is a classic example of regulatory overreach based on anecdote.  The NTSB wants to use one tired driver’s indefensible and extreme texting (which led to horrific results) as an excuse to ban all use of portable electronic devices while driving – including hands-free phone conversations.  Before states act on this recommendation, they should carefully examine systematic evidence – not just anecdotes — to determine whether different uses of handheld devices pose different risks. They should also consider whether bans on some uses would expose drivers to risks greater than the risk the ban would prevent.
Read more at techliberation.com
 


Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, August 09, 2011

The Incomparable @SarahPalinUSA

As a writer, I am continually impressed by Sarah Palin's ability to do the writer's job: convey meaning as efficiently as possible. By efficiently, I mean so that the words we use do not get in the way of understanding. The reader neither has to struggle with a definition or sentence construct, nor wonder why she didn't use some polysyllabic parallelism.



Some highbrow types might think that's a left-handed compliment, but it isn't. It's a full on tip of the hat from an aspiring wordsmith to his better.



But the test of a pundit is not just the ability to convey meaning, but the ability to grasp it, divine the important parts, and write about them.



Read the linked essay on the downgrade of the US credit rating, and what's important for us now.

Amplify’d from www.facebook.com
I know none of this will be easy, but, “thick” or not, the average American outside the D.C. politico bubble knows that we no longer have a choice! We will have entitlement reform and a balanced budget; it’s just a matter of how. We can do it ourselves in a calm, methodical, and responsible manner, or we can wait for the world’s capital markets to ram it down on us. Let’s be responsible and do it ourselves.
Read more at www.facebook.com
 


Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Sen. Rand Paul endorses @TedCruz for #TXSen

I'm not sure this is news, but Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) endorses Ted Cruz for US Senate from Texas:
 

I’ve watched Ted Cruz take a stand against the tax and spend crowd, and I’m convinced that he is the constitutional conservative candidate who can help solve our problems in Washington.

Having met Ted and heard him speak on multiple occasions, I believe him to be driven by his ideals, and not by the desire for personal power. Paul continues:


Ted Cruz is a great candidate for Tea Party conservatives - and for all Republicans concerned about stopping the exploding federal spending.


It's time for constitutional conservatives (especially but not only) in Texas to rally around Cruz to beat the establishment candidate.


Sphere: Related Content

Monday, July 25, 2011

It's not clueless flipflopping, though. (h/t @mkhammer)

Even though the president says stuff he has no reasonable anticipation of being able to back up, he's the reasonable, one according to Associate Depressed,

Amplify’d from hosted.ap.org
White House shifts in unpredictable debt debate

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The roller-coaster debate over raising the nation's debt limit has forced the White House to explain away, brush aside or even ignore declarations by President Barack Obama and aides that no longer served much purpose in the unpredictable negotiations.

The White House shifts have been less a matter of flip-flops and more a case of unforeseen twists forcing the administration to reposition as the Aug. 2 deadline to prevent the U.S. from defaulting on its financial obligations draws closer.

The White House's willingness to change course underscores efforts to cast Obama as a reasonable and flexible compromiser in the face of Republican intransigence.

Read more at hosted.ap.org
 


Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Uh, @ewerickson? Check your sources.

I know it's hard to pass up the admission against interest aspect of the Democratic Underground calling Eric Holder an international criminal and terrorist supporter.



But considering the other bat-guano crazy material in their post (http://gadaf.fi/anw) you linked to from Redstate (http://gadaf.fi/anx), their reliability as a source takes something of a hit.



I mean, they thought Obama was one of them all along.

Chiquita death squad attorney Eric Holder floated for U.S. Attorney General!
Obama might as well appoint Albert Gonzales as A.G. That's what Holder and Gonzales do for a living--they get big powerful, multi-millionaire white men immunity for mass murder of the poor and the brown.

I was willing to give Obama the benefit of the doubt on the appointment of Rahm Emmanuel as WH chief of staff--at least until we see who he wants as DNC chair (if Dean is leaving that position). Emmanuel is the DLC politico who went round dropping cash on pro-war Democrats, to defeat anti-war Democrats and real leftists (majorityists) in the '06 primaries. He is as responsible as Pelosi and Reid for Congress' 10% approval rating (worse than Bush!). This is to be Obama's "gatekeeper"--a powerful DLCer who hates the grass roots and the 70% majority of Americans opposed to the Iraq War, and likely would have done anything in his power to prevent Obama from getting the nomination? Yup! Him. Chief of staff.
Read more at www.democraticunderground.com
 


Sphere: Related Content

Blog stats

Add to Technorati Favorites