Saturday, October 23, 2010

The Battle for the Party - All Politics is, in fact, local. #tcot

When politics is local, it depends on the interpersonal political skills of the players to achieve their ends. Unfortunately, a sly demon can work wiles on the unsuspecting, achieving his own goals which may or may not be good for the rest of us.



Our goal as conservatives should be to root out those who are just in politics to amass personal power. They should be replaced by those who are driven by ideology. Because when the battle is over ideas, we win; when it's about giving away other people's money, we lose. Read more at Redstate.

Amplify’d from www.redstate.com



The Battle for the Party


All politics is local. — Tip O’Neil (D-MA), Speaker of the House (1977-87).


Tip O’Neil was wrong.


O’Neil thought that all national issues were really about street-level ones — that everything devolved to the petty self-interest of the individual voter and how a policy would benefit or harm each one personally.  His mistake was ignoring both the peer pressure of people to ignore that petty self-interest for principles they know to be true, and to put their short-term interest aside for the greater good of the larger group — which will in the end help them more.


But O’Neil was also right.  And to take back the Party, and the nation, we need to learn how.


Read More →

Read more at www.redstate.com
 


Sphere: Related Content

Friday, October 22, 2010

O'Donnell within striking distance in Delaware -- but where is Chris Coons? #DESen #Teaparty

The biased moderators, hostile audience, and media spin couldn't help an arrogant and buffoonish socialist Democrat Chris Coons in the debates with conservative Republican Christine O'Donnell.



O'Donnell has cut a 20 point lead down to just 7 points, and appears to have momentum going into the final two weekends of the campaign.



Combined with what is expected to be massive conservative and Republican turnout on November 2, the race may be O'Donnell's at this point. Democrats must be left wondering what they can possibly do to protect Coons.



After O'Donnell shellacked him in debates held the far, Coons backed out of a debate at the University of Delaware. He apparently fears showing voters his poor grasp of the issues, inability to cope with details, and churlish personal manner.



The Delaware Senate special election is considered vital for both sides. Democrats need to keep the seat, which was held by Joe Biden before he was forced to resign in 2008. Republicans would like to use the seat to stop the Obama agenda during the lame duck session.

TCJ Research 10/19-10/20 Poll: Christine O’Donnell Inches Closer to Chris Coons in Delaware Senate Race

Each poll uses a random sampling of 1000 Likely Voters (unless otherwise stated) and has a +/- 4% margin of error (M.o.E).  Poll that don’t add up to 100 are due to rounding.  Commentary on the following results will be posted in a follow-up post.

Delaware Senate: 51%- (D)Chris Coons, 44%- (R)Christine O’Donnell, 4%- Undecided, 1%- Other

Read more at theconservativejournal.wordpress.com
 


Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

Hey @LATimes -- Ginni Thomas can't harm the reputation of the SCOTUS. As if it matters. #p2 #tcot

That's also why the LA Times goes out of its way to find "legal ethicists" who question the wisdom of a Supreme Court Justice's wife being so public in her opposition to something that may come before her husband.



It may damage the Court's prestige, or some claptrap.



The Supreme Court does not operate on prestige. It has no need of prestige. The opinion of the People, of Congress, the President, the United Nations, or some foreign potentate of our Supreme Court are of no consequence whatever to its function.



And if the Court can have its reputation harmed by one woman speaking out and demanding that the Constitution be followed, then it's not much of an institution.

Amplify’d from www.latimes.com

Justice Thomas' wife says healthcare law is unconstitutional

Virginia Thomas is working to repeal the law through Liberty Central, a conservative group she founded. Her husband, Justice Clarence Thomas, could provide a key vote to strike down the law.

A longtime conservative activist in Washington, Virginia Thomas has recently raised her profile as a frequent speaker at "tea party" rallies and conservative conferences as she promotes her new online venture.

Her engagement in partisan politics through Liberty Central is unprecedented for a spouse of a Supreme Court justice, legal scholars say. Her group is funded by donors whose identities are not publicly disclosed, fueling concerns that corporate donors could secretly fund Liberty Central in order to gain favor with her husband.

Virginia Thomas did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday. In the past, she has described her work as separate from her husband's and passionately defended her right to express her opinions, a point legal ethics expert do not dispute.

"As a matter of formal legal ethics, a spouse's opinion on a constitutional issue, even if widely disseminated, does not require a judge's disqualification," said Northwestern University law professor Steven Lubet. "Her wisdom or judgment is not something I can comment on."

However, Stephen Gillers, a legal ethics professor at New York University, said Virginia Thomas' advocacy did threaten to tarnish the court's appearance of nonpartisanship.

"I would have hoped for greater self-restraint out of respect for the court. She is hurting the institution," he said. "But that's just my concern. The rules don't stop her. Mrs. Thomas has a 1st Amendment right to take a prominent public position on any legal or political issue she chooses. The conflict and recusal rules govern Justice Thomas, not his wife."

Read more at www.latimes.com
 


Sphere: Related Content

The Desperation That Is the Quinn Campaign #ILGov #ILGOP #ILCot

Desperate campaigns are easy to spot. The campaign of soon-to-be-ex-Governor Pat Quinn is one of the easiest of all to pick out among even the wicked crop this election season, as the career politician sees his hold on power slowly circle the drain.



When Pat Quinn was younger, I remember thinking of him as something of a reformer.  He was always talking about cleaning up government, making it more responsive to the people and the laws under which we all live.



But either that changed, or it never was.  Quinn wasted a golden opportunity to clean up state government when he succeeded the reviled Rod Blagojevich.  He could have:



  • Demanded a forensic audit of the state's books


  • Fired all political appointees, and made them apply for their jobs with some kind of mechanism to retain the good but not accept the bad


  • Stopped the wasteful, corrupt spending practices of the state


  • Listened to Republican ideas about balancing the budget without tax increases






But he didn't. He continued the Blagojevich-style power grab, giving lip-service to ethics reforms because he couldn't avoid it, and proceeded to run the state into the ground.



I had high hopes that the populist reformer would resurface, but in the end I was disappointed. He was just another machine politician, out to buy votes with state favors -- or crush opposition if he couldn't buy it off.



After his campaign was flagged for misleading voters with half-truths in a campaign ad distorting long-shelved legislation involving stray pets, published reports called Quinn’s video “America’s nastiest political ad,” saying it reached “a new low.”



Illinois state finances the worst in history, due entirely to the fiscal mismanagement and big-government, spend every dime policies of the Democratic machine. It's time for a clean break from the politics of personal destruction and fabricated scandals that are the only tools in Pat Quinn's toolbox. Quinn and his big government allies don't have a record they can run on, so they can only smear.



Bill’s campaign is about cleaning up state government, getting its boot off the neck of business so business can go about creating more jobs  Pat Quinn’s focus is forcing Illinoisans to fund his big government, make-work vote-buying programs that place his campaign interests before the people’s interests.



Have we in Illinois not had enough of this trash in office? The Chicago and Illinois Combine insiders like Quinn, Rod Blagojevich, and even George Ryan before that, need to be shown the door.  Our state needs to be cleaned up.



Desperation has set in for the Quinn campaign. They can see their cushy state gig swirling the drainhole, their dreams of power disappearing into the darkness below.



Illinois deserves better from its governor. Please tell your friends and neighbors about Pat Quinn’s shameful campaign smears, and to support Bill Brady.



Spread the word by volunteering through the Illinois Victory program today.  If you don't have time, financial contributions are another way you can help Bill Brady reach Illinois voters.  You can donate through his website, or online at the new contribution tab on Facebook.



Go to  bradyforillinois.com, or hit them on Facebook and Twitter.


Sphere: Related Content

Dear People of Delaware, Illinois, and West Virginia |#lameduck #DESen #ILSen #WVSen #teaparty #GOTV @RedState

These three Senate races may be the key to whether we stop the Marxist agenda in its tracks, or whether we lose even more before our candidates even get into office.



Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

No one in #tcot, #teaparty, or #tlot go to MorOn.org http://bit.ly/b98Tin and sign up to make calls you don't plan to make. http://amplify.com/u/d93a


Sphere: Related Content

It sounds like that other word. #ilgob #tcot #p2 #fail #ILSen

There is a bigger -- if I may use such a loaded term -- problem with digging at the form of written words and gigging people for using words you think sound funny. To the digger or gigger, the shock and offense may be real, or they may the work of some political ligger, hanging on to the apron strings of power trying to jigger up outrage.



We know better, don't we? Words mean what they mean, not what words with similar sounds mean. Winnie the Pooh didn't think Tigger was anything but a tiger, because Tigger was a tiger -- bouncy, clouncy, founcy tail notwithstanding. He didn't get distracted by the sound of his name and think, because of his name, that a big orange cat was a beggar or a wigger.



It's all pretty silly.

Amplify’d from downstateiladvocate.com

The Desperation of Alexi Giannoulias Becomes Even More Desperate By Playing The Race Card Against Mark Kirk

Mark Kirk was recently secretly recorded talking about watching out for possible voter fraud in the Chicago and Rockford on November 2nd.  Like it or not, it is a valid argument considering Illinois' interesting voting past.  The terms "vote early and vote often" and "the dead vote" didn't come into everyday parlance from out of the blue.  Just off hand, will the secret recorder be prosecuted considering in Illinois, both parties must consent to being recorded?
When Mark Kirk's secret recording came out, the media, Democrats and others started to cry foul, not only because of allegations of possible voter fraud, but because in discussing poll watching Mark Kirk said:

"These are lawyers and other people that will be deployed in key, vulnerable precincts, for example, South and West sides of Chicago, Rockford Metro East...where the other side might be tempted to jigger the numbers somewhat."

The Democrats and others are really upset that Kirk used the word "jigger" because as the Rev. Albert Tyson of St. Stephen's AME Church explained,

"The problem I have is that it sounds so much like another word".
Read more at downstateiladvocate.com
 


Sphere: Related Content

Blog stats

Add to Technorati Favorites