They Don't Need to Retract
In what can only be described as lunactivism, the 88 faculty members at Duke University who signed a letter assigning guilt to the Lacrosse team have refused to retract it, or even to issue an apology for their excessive zeal. It's a wonderful example of idealistic fervor trumping good sense.
At The Minority Report blog, Daveinboca has a piece up about the Duke Lacrosse case. I don't call it the "Duke Rape Case", because the only people raped in that case were, figuratively speaking, the accused.
Why don't the Duke faculty need to apologize and issue a retraction of their infamous letter assigning guilt to the Lacrosse team? In a comment there, I said:
In their minds, they were right. It's the facts that were wrong, but only because this case was either A) an aberration or B) proof that rich White kids can do what they want.
Some of them in B) have it figured that the rich and powerful pulled strings and got the case to turn out how they wanted.
Others in A) are unhinged in a slightly different direction: they think that even though these particular rich White kids were put through the ringer this time, the justice system is still lopsided in their favor and it's only fair, because the academics just know this kind of thing happens to poor Blacks all the time.
No, it doesn't. While it may be true that the system is rigged against the poor, politicians don't pin their reelection hopes on prosecuting a particular set of poor Black defendants, or at least not on the basis that they're poor and Black.
Our legal system is biased in favor of the rich and powerful, but the bias is more heavily against the passive. Those who will fight the system, make noise, and do whatever they can to protest an injustice against them (whether justice is actually on their side or not) often will be rewarded, while those who roll over and accept their fate (deserved or not) will be punished.
Sphere: Related Content
3 comments:
But maybe they do need one of those surgical "retractors" to have their brains examined (since they're in the wrong place and all).
You're referring to CRI - Craniorectal Inversion, Jimmy, and it's a serious disorder, not something about which fun should be made.
Shame on you for joking at the expense of the craniorectally challenged.
Whoa, there, Professor Howdy. Do you think Loren wants all your stuff?
And Loren, retract this: YOU'RE REALLY FUNNY (inspite of your own claims).
That "Ba Rackobama..." thing you did last night cracked me up.
Post a Comment